They call her “queen of corruption,” among many other equally flattering nicknames. Regardless of your opinion about the fact that the “president of the European Commission” Ursula von der Leyen has so far managed to escape any scrutiny (and certainly any punishment) for the shady deals she made alongside her friend, the veterinarian CEO of Pfizer, when purchasing mRNA platforms for “the entire population” (multiple doses for each arm…), becoming the “European queen of the genetic campaign,” this fact indicates that she has strong backing within the network of deep states of the West. Of the EU and the USA.
And this in turn, the broad shoulders, indicate that when this particular person “predicts” (in the media in September 2025, in the European Parliament) a new global health crisis is certain to threaten. Add to this threat something else important: the other permanent favorite theme of this “queen of doom” is war (with Russia).
So: war and health crisis… Health crisis and war… From the same dirty mouth; or, more accurately, from the same top representative of the Western bio-informational-militaristic complex. Should we take this bipolarity seriously? Or ignore it as a decadent rant among others?
We suggest the first one. Especially since steps are already being taken.
A year ago1 we wrote about a “second wave” of genetic engineering. What was then, as far as we knew, taking place in distant Japan, is now in Europe. Right next to you / us – and awaiting you / us unannounced and insidiously: the genetic engineering technology for modifying (essentially for expropriating) cellular function that began with mRNA platforms has advanced. And with the (endearing) name replicon, which names the automatic and continuous reproduction of infectious proteins within animal (human and not only) cells, it is now approved by the EU – in the form of vaccines for the spike protein of covid-19 but, as we will see next, also for any preventive or/and therapeutic agent they deem beneficial to the accounting books of pharmaceutical cartels.
The unpleasant fact, that the “competent” guardians of public health in the EU have approved something that is (already proven…) multiple times more lethal / harmful compared to the first-generation mRNA platforms, unfortunately touches upon the invisible-to-the-common-people capitalist dialectic of power. At first glance, it is unthinkable that after everything that has happened and is happening as “side effects” (or perhaps “collateral damage” of a declared war?) of the mass imposition of genetic engineering; after thousands of studies and researches across the planet that prove not only through statistical correlation but now through specific bio-functional analysis how mRNA platforms cause aggressive, invasive cancers; how they cause “autoimmune” diseases by destroying the natural immune system; how they cause myocarditis/pericarditis; how they cause dozens or even hundreds of neurological, reproductive, and other damages to human bodies; despite all this, second-generation mRNA platforms are approved as if nothing is wrong: the “self-replicating” ones that continuously persist inside the body.
And yet. This seemingly unthinkable situation has become reality, aided by one and only one reason: because the mass reactions to the hygiene coup d’état campaign of 2020–2022 and the mass imposition of genetic engineering were limited to significant but “peripheral” issues (the prohibitions, the coercions), or were launched (deliberately…) into the stratosphere of mysterious theories about “depopulation”… They avoided, that is, examining the technical aspects of biotechnologies (in general) and this specific manifestation of genetic engineering (in particular). Or, as Wu Ming (and others alike) put it simplistically, despite being otherwise critical: these are scientific matters, we cannot have an opinion…
But if we cannot—or do not wish to exert ourselves to—have an opinion on anything that appears before us as a “scientific” or “technological” matter, then we will have an opinion on very little, both of the “superstructure” and, mainly, the “base” of the 4th capitalist bio-industrial revolution! Amidst the orgy of fragmented knowledge (and imposed ignorance!!!) that could be called the dictatorship of the specialists/technicians of capital (something that at its core is not original at all), we will always be the condemned, the enslaved, the occupied ignorants. The unlearned, alienated beings who perhaps, perhaps we say, understand from time to time that something-is-not-right… yet without being able to delve deeper, to connect the scattered pieces of suspicions and anxieties, to identify the constitutional principles and the real purposes of the capture and mechanization of cells, thoughts, feelings in favor of capitalist exploitation; prey to every institutional “psychological operation,” that is, to every deliberately constructed rumor, organized “alternative” disinformation, conspicuous stupidity, self-destructive voluntary servitude.
This is the capitalist dialectic of power. If you leave gaps in your defense, in your resistance, the master will discover them, will exploit them, and will turn them against you.
The “first wave”…
Before we proceed to the developments regarding replicons, certain relatively recent developments/revelations (if we may use the term) regarding the organization of the generalized imposition of genetic engineering have taken place here.
On the 28th of last July (2025), the European «commission» (the one presided over by the «queen of sepsis»…) admitted, in the most natural manner in the world, while responding to an inquiry, that it had approved the imposition (excuse me: the use) of mRNA platforms «conditionally», and that as of the end of July 2025 it did NOT possess their «complete data dossier»!!!
This “conditional marketing authorization” is an “emergency health needs approval” process, without much – much, where the “emergency health needs” is declared by whoever is more lubricated by pharmaceutical companies (in this case the head of the ‘World Health Organization’ /WHO….), and where approval is given only with the assurance of the interested pharmaceutical companies that “the benefits are greater than the risks”. Without further shameless questions about what kind of risks these are, without questioning that someone who sells genetic engineering which before 2020 proved catastrophic when used can give such assurances.
Of course: without any hesitation to turn the health and physical condition of millions of underlings into a matter of accounting and butchery. Revenues – expenses, profits – losses, and the rest…
How this blind approval for the mass use/enforcement of mRNA platforms was given to the EU by the competent authority (EMA) we already know from 2021. After first creating the spectacle of death, Ms. Ursula von der Lyen, as political spokesperson for the Pfizer pharmaceutical mafia, and Ms. Angela Dorothea Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, as political spokesperson for the German pharmaceutical mafia Biontech, threatened and blackmailed the rather hesitant/skeptical EMA staff.
In mid-January 2021, internal emails and documents of the EMA obtained through hacking a month earlier, in December 2020, were published on the dark web. The material appeared on two hacker forums: Raidforums, an English-speaking database of leaks and hacks, and Rutor, a Russian-speaking equivalent. It was nearly 900 pages of internal reports and memoranda, including 20 different email exchanges between EMA employees and executives, up until the end of November 2020. That is the period when the agency responsible for protecting Europeans’ health from pharmaceutical preparations had to approve or reject the mRNA platforms.
The leaked emails revealed that EMA officials were under extreme pressure from the “top of the commission” to accelerate approvals without many objections or doubts. As early as November 19, 2020, Ursula had publicly announced that approval for both the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna platforms would be granted by the end of the year. However, EMA officials were not at all pleased, to put it diplomatically, with these “pressures,” as evident from email exchanges between them on November 12, 19, and 20, 2020. “The new thing, in my opinion, is that von der Leyen has clearly stated that both vaccines will be approved before the end of the year. There are still issues with both, so we need to see if all these can be resolved in time without compromising the validity of the assessment,” wrote an EMA official in an email on November 20. A day earlier, another email described to a colleague a phone conversation between EMA officials and a commissioner from the “commission”: “The atmosphere was rather tense… sometimes even a bit unpleasant… This climate shows what awaits EMA if their expectations [meaning the ‘commission’] are not met, regardless of whether those expectations are realistic or not… If weeks intervene between the FDA and MHRA approvals [the British agency that had already approved the platforms…] on one hand and EMA on the other, this will not be acceptable to the ‘commission’. There will be ‘political consequences’… We must be ready for the worst-case scenario. We will face difficulties on all fronts, caught in the middle of a storm. Whose support will we be able to rely on then?“
It became evident that the attack of genetic engineering was directed not (only) by entrepreneurs of mass morbidity production but also by political showcases. Mainly from the latter since they needed “state decrees”: from the “queen of sepsis” but also from the German chancellor who was under the direct influence of “special” German officials of the bio-informational-militaristic complex. However, something else became evident: the construction of the “emergency situation”, of the “terrifying threat of coronavirus” which “required immediate measures” was of structural, organic importance in order to immediately pass the mRNA platforms into mass use without even the most elementary anticipated checks.
Good or bad, and because this “stolen” material could bypass the well-paid “integration” in the attack of the bio-info-military complex of the entire group of professional demagogues in the EU and their bosses (journalists, influencers, doctors, media owners in general) and reach the subordinates revealing what is happening, the EMA administration issued successive announcements on January 15 and January 25, where, neither a little nor a lot, although it admitted the leak, it supported that “part of the correspondence has been manipulated by the actors … in a way that could undermine confidence in vaccines”.
However, there was a lack of specific clarification regarding who these despicable actors might be, who wanted to shake Europeans’ confidence in vaccines. It wasn’t difficult to “identify” them, and guess who the rabbit pulled out of the hat was: Russians! “Experts” were called upon to confirm that Moscow waged a “hybrid war” against European health, while promoting its own vaccine, of an older type, Sputnik (which, incidentally, was never approved by the WHO…). Such as Jean-Michel Doan, an open-source analyst specializing in cybercrime at a French company:
… This type of hacking tactic involving data theft that follows data breaches has already been employed by Russian agents…
Essentially, and this is particularly important, what the EMA officials wanted to investigate in more detail but were not allowed to do so, were the industrial production processes of the mRNA platforms. As they are required to do for the approval of any drug or vaccine. This mainly, as emerges from the email leak.
However, the devil is in the detail of this “any”. mRNA platforms were genetic interventions in organisms; they have nothing to do with common vaccines. The control requirements for genetic intervention processes are much broader than those for common vaccines: they include systematic checks for biodistribution, organ toxicity, immunogenicity, carcinogenicity likelihood, and others. But if mRNA platforms were “sneaking through” as common vaccines, then controls would be simplified… and it would be feasible to compress them temporally.
And so it was. And as we will see next, this is the trigger for approving the “next wave” of the genetic attack, the replicon.
The issue of how the order “fire!” was given for the “first wave” has recently resurfaced, when on the 16th of last September (2025) the “center-left” Berlin newspaper berliner zeitung published the following, based on a new response from the “commission” to a related inquiry:
You will remember of course: the “it is safe and effective” in the snake-filled mouths of the experts had become something like the “amen” every hour of the day and night….
What specifically does this “approved without complete safety data” mean? We saw earlier that there was intense “pressure” on EMA’s technical staff, presented as “political” haste, as the “responsibility of political shop windows” facing death-row masses. Was the cause therefore an innocent, completely hurried rush by political shop windows due to their ignorance about saving their subordinates? Was it their ignorance? Or was it something else, deliberate?
The first two possibilities have been absolutely and categorically ruled out. The declassification of confidential documents from Pfizer to the American FDA approval agency (similar documents should exist in the European EMA archives…) revealed that just 3 months after the start of the mRNA platform rollouts (which took place as much as possible around the globe), the pharmaceutical company sent a first “report” (as of February 28, 2021) in which the company itself had recorded 42,086 official medical reports worldwide for 158,893 “adverse events.” These included cardiovascular, hematological, hepatic, neurological, autoimmune, musculoskeletal “side effects,” as well as damage to pregnant women. The fact that this particular confidential/secret “report” was accompanied by a 9-page list of hundreds of possible “side effects” proves that from the beginning of the global imposition of genetic engineering mRNA platforms, the “competent authorities” were fully aware (and indeed from the pharmaceutical companies themselves) of the human catastrophe that would follow.
In the past, there were several 1, 2 or 3 officially confirmed serious side effects for the use of a drug or a (preventive) vaccine to stop. In 2021, the nearly 160,000 side effects in just 3 months and the apocalyptic predictions of the manufacturers themselves were simply a sign that “everything is going well.”2
What remains is the issue of intent. Various assessments and theories have been formulated regarding this (within or outside quotation marks) ranging from the far-fetched notion of a “campaign to reduce the global population” (whereas a “limited” nuclear war would be far more deadly, while also resolving various other intra-capitalist disputes and differences…) to the more down-to-earth view concerning the pursuit of quick profits by pharmaceutical companies.
Given that that explosive profitability of specific pharmaceutical mafias implied a corresponding surge in state loans/debts, one would assume that if the only goal was corporate balance sheets, shareholders’ profits, and CEOs’ bonuses, the states would have reacted—for their own interest in controlling their debts. Not only did they not react, but on the contrary, they strategically cooperated both in imposing the sanitization terror campaign and in tearing up their formal constitutions, as well as in the mass imposition of genetic engineering. Which, in this particular case, religiously protected within the mechanisms, was the “phase 3” of the (formal) trials of any “pharmaceutical” intervention….
Consequently, the expediency was considerably more complex than the typical corporate “greed.” As we will argue subsequently, expediency can be located in the war–health dichotomy…
The “second wave”…
On December 12, 2024, the EMA itself approved for public use the vaccine with the commercial name KOSTAIVE (manufacturing code ARCT-154) from CSL and Arcturus Therapeutics, always against covid-19… Two months later, on February 14, 2025, the European Commission (commission, Ursula…) put its seal on its circulation: KOSTAIVE is the first self-replicating mRNA genetic engineering platform∙ sa-mRNA! Which means that the infection / hacking of human cells by viral mRNA (and, consequently, the “side effects”) does not occur once for each cell of the body, but continues guaranteed for at least one year (12 months), causing permanent illness!
It is believed that this infectious doping forces the immune system to constantly produce antibodies… But precisely the cytokine storm (this is the formal term for the hyper-reaction of the immune system after an infection) is one of the main causes of side effects (including the most severe and long-lasting ones) from the previous, “simple” mRNA platforms!!!
In short. The approved “officially” in the EU seven months ago turbo-mRNA platforms, after the catastrophic “results” of 2, 3, 4 years of platforming with the “simple” mRNA platforms of the pharmaceutical cartels pfizer/biotech and moderna, ensure, guarantee what in 2020 and 2021 was a conjecture, a predictable but not yet proven mass murder!
Are we being excessive? Not at all. In cyborg no 31 we wrote about KOSTAIVE’s approval in Japan. A little earlier than in the EU. There they released it in September 2014: Arcturus Therapeutics appeared as a Japanese company, although it is American, a product of a merger with the Israeli Alcobra Ltd, based in San Diego. With a poor track record, Arcturus gained momentum when it patented in 2013 its own recipe for lipid nanoparticles (: Lunar) which are the “transporters/injectors” of artificial mRNA into living cells.
The Japanese approval of KOSTAIVE and, essentially, the approval of the biotechnological application of continuous reproduction of a viral factor within human bodies (the infamous “spike protein”) through strategic hacking of the natural immune system, was achieved “easily and comfortably” by relying on the approval of the “first wave”! As the following excerpt from a report by Japanese doctors notes, the assumption was that “at most, with the replicon, there might be the same side effects as the Pfizer and Moderna platforms.” Sure!
We reasonably assume that exactly the same thing happened with the permanently hacked EMA!
But the result was even more catastrophic, if it were possible to have “more”!
What is it that the “self-replicating” mRNA platform of the replicon does that the mRNA platforms of the “first wave” did not? Perhaps little, but strategically significant. The manufacturers of the “first wave” claimed that the lipid nanoparticles carrying the artificial messenger RNA of the viral protein would target a limited number of muscle cells (around the injection site in the arm), “triggering” the immune response of the natural immune system. In reality, however, as is now well-known, the billions of lipid nanoparticles dispersed throughout the body, with particularly high, though not exclusive, concentrations in specific organs, forcing the immune system to attack millions of infected cells within the body itself for over 2 years (this is what current studies show), with devastating results.
The “self-replicating” mRNA (i.e., the permanent production of the pathological protein) of the replicon does what the “first wave” platforms allegedly did “by mistake”! It permanently installs itself in cells and reproduces the viral protein for months, simultaneously protecting (in a way that escapes us) these cells from the immune system’s therapeutic attempt to destroy them as enemies. It sounds paranoid, but this is exactly what is happening: the advantage of the replicon is (what the bosses are selling to the masses) that it doesn’t require continuous repeated “vaccinations,” which burden healthcare systems with administrative costs (“vaccination centers,” staff, vaccine storage, etc.) – just as happened with the “first wave”!!!
Organized permanent production of illness within bodies with the purpose of … prevention? It would be paranoid even if the (literally) slaughter-of-the-gullible with the “first wave” of mRNA platforms had not preceded it!
And yet there are 2 or 3 elements now that, by altering the situation compared to the imposition of the “first wave,” complete the puzzle, making it more necessary for it to be reconstructed. First, there is no “alarm,” no coercion, no “emergency”—while the variants of Sars-CoV-2 continue to circulate quietly, comfortably, and nicely (which proves just how “dangerous” this virus was from the beginning!!!). Second, as the Japanese case shows, those who are now “convinced” are very few in number compared to those who were frightened, believed, or were simply forced during the “first wave.” But this seems to be of no concern. Ten thousand (in Japan)? Ten thousand is okay…. Third, as a consequence of the second, the immediate financial gains for the pharmaceutical cartels promoting this “reproduction” are small, minimal compared to the companies of the “first round,” and in any case, these profits cannot be attributed as the motive for this (even if numerically limited) new massacre. Fourth but not least: the officials “responsible for protecting citizens’ health,” technical and/or political figureheads, are absolutely indifferent to the consequences of the “second wave,” just as they were and are indifferent to the consequences of the “first.” They follow instructions; but we don’t know exactly what these instructions are.
What is the goal?
Should we perhaps look at the base of the bioinformatics-military complex? Do the obsessions of the “queen of sepsis” war and health, health and war reflect this goal?
biological warfare (;)
In cyborg no 31 (spring 2022) we published a text by the Belgian communist (and professor of international relations) Kees van der Pijl. It was the second part of an extensive and highly detailed analysis that van der Pijl published in April 2020 titled Health Crisis or Seizure of Power? His view is multi-faceted, and naturally there is no reason to republish it here. Only this excerpt, which illuminates the path through the dense darkness:
… The fact that the American military promotes permanent genetic modifications as a means of protecting its troops from biological weapons and infectious diseases highlights that research is never merely defensive or offensive; it is a deployment in the battlefield that allows the American military to prevail in a situation where chemical and biological weapons would be used…
Gene – modifications – as – a – means – of – protecting – American – soldiers – from – biological – weapons? But this is exactly what mRNA platforms have been doing so far as a “means of protection” from a harmless virus!!! Ensuring the permanent production of a specific protein (or more), in this case a viral, disease-causing protein (to mobilize, supposedly, the hacked immune system), is at the heart not of one but of many research programs of DARPA.
To put it differently, from DARPA’s militaristic perspective: if we use a biotechnologically reconstructed virus as a weapon, and if our army is forced to operate in the (hostile) environment where our biological weapon is active, then we must beforehand have reconstructed/mutated the organism of our soldiers, so that they can withstand…
In the Prologue of Panouklas3 Critical Art Ensemble supported that “biological weapons” are useless in practice, and that the related rumors are used exclusively for internal (ideologically disciplinary) consumption. Here is a representative excerpt:
… Even from a military perspective, the case of microbial warfare and bioterrorism is representative of the economy of uselessness. The systematic interest in this economy has ranged from little to enormous following the use of chemical weapons during World War I. However, from the beginning, there was a continuous disagreement within the military regarding how effective biological weapons could be. The initial position taken by the United States Army was that such weapons were a waste of resources. This view was best expressed by Colonel Leon Fox of the United States Army Medical Corps in an article written in 1932 for military surgeons titled “Bacterial Warfare: The Use of Biological Factors in War.” In this article, Fox laid the groundwork for what still constitutes the main arguments against the utility of such weapons, including the boomerang effect, bacterial viability, and the belief that biological weapons would not be as effective as many existing alternative solutions. Even at that early date, there was a degree of understanding regarding the generation of the spectacle of fear in relation to this particular subject.
The bacterial war is one of the recent terrifying problems brought to us by pseudoscientists who contribute to the hot pages of Sunday supplements circulating in the national press… I believe it is highly questionable whether biological agents are suitable for war…
In 1932 (or in 2006) there was something that could be considered an insurmountable technological limit, the “boomerang phenomenon” (that is: the spread/uncontrolled circulation of a military anthrax virus in areas where it shouldn’t be, even to the lines of the attacker: it was the belief that it is not possible to have (timely) “antidotes”; or, even if it were possible to have them, they would come later, too late.
But what for some seemed an insurmountable limit, for others could be an obstacle that must be overcome! With the technical and biological knowledge of 1932, such a thing would seem inconceivable. The same appeared to be true in 1969, when the then American president Nixon was convinced by Matthew Meselson, a biology professor at Harvard, and his team, that such weapons are useless and furthermore dangerous (due to the “boomerang effect”) for a state that already possessed a nuclear arsenal. Nixon then promoted the international ban on research and possession of (chemical and) biological weapons (despite the contrary view of his initial skeptics, who cited corresponding Soviet research), something that the USSR accepted by signing, in 1972, the “Convention on the Prohibition of Biological Weapons.”4
Overcoming the “boomerang” limitation was a technological temptation not unjustified from a military point of view. This is because biological weapons (and to some extent chemical weapons) have an advantage that no other weapons possess: they can easily lack “identity,” they don’t reveal their manufacturers, it’s hard to tell who deployed them, and they can be presented as a “natural phenomenon.” Moreover, they require only a relatively small initial quantity of suitably engineered viruses; their multiplication is ensured by their genetic potential!
For a capitalist state to have the ability to cause serious harm (illness, death, and, certainly, mass fear) to an opponent, to their army and/or population, while being “fortified” against the specific pathogen, acting covertly and without exposure, assuming responsibility, has been (and has become even more so) an irresistible temptation. Especially in an era (the 21st century) when “hybrid” wars have become fashionable.
Formally, the “Convention” of 1972/1975 is still in effect. “Under” it, however, the process of exemption-from-the-phenomenon-boom, what is called with the neutral term “scientific research”, could continue in various ways. Here is one: an unknown-origin virus appears, a virus considered extremely deadly; we must quickly create the “antidote”; this will be done with “new technologies” (biotechnologies); and it will be tested en masse to see how it works…
The paranoid (at first glance only) measures that were implemented / imposed during the health terror campaign, the fact that in all “national committees of experts for emergencies” there was at least one high-ranking caravan official, and—mainly—the political (and by no means “scientific,” inside or outside quotation marks) directive for the mass enforcement of mRNA genetic engineering platforms logically converge at this point: “conducting biological warfare.” In fact, occasionally, the term “biosafety” (a purely military/militaristic term) has been heard here and there since 2020, from Beijing to Washington and the other Western capitals. The strategic merging of non-military sectors of capitalist states into military ones was almost publicly advertised!
Already, the “first wave” had clearly (for those who have eyes to see and minds to understand) these central elements of the establishment’s management:
First of all, and by no means ideologically insignificant, the terminology about war and the invisible enemy…
Secondly, the shaping with completely contemptible propagandistic materials of a “state of emergency” situation where persuasion would be just one tool, certainly supplemented by every possible procedure of population mobilization (e.g. “punishment of the disobedient”…) including the exploitation of “fighting volunteers”…
Third, the admission that yes, we will have losses, we may have many losses, we will hide them so as not to undermine the “morale” of our populations (and the profits of our instructed industries…) – but that’s how wars are, what can we do; there are also “collateral losses”…
Fourth, our new super technology, the aggressive, militaristic, s.d.i.t. (: moderna is a spin off of DARPA…) genetic engineering and its technicians will monitor all developments, record, experiment, measure the “losses”, upgrade – and we promise that “technological progress” will not stop!!!
Instead of considering the “first wave” of the genetic engineering breakthrough as an isolated incident, extreme but unique, the approval of the “second wave” obliges us to incorporate the above four key characteristics into a chain of tactics. The “second wave,” the approval of the replicon, illuminates with the frozen light of the moment both the previous phase and the path forward.
The “second wave” does not have the massive propaganda/enforcement of the first; it has the other three basic characteristics, and additionally these:
First, the “self-reproduction” of the pathology (sorry: of the “therapeuticity”…) of the cells hacked by genetic engineering – that which in the “first wave” was hidden or considered “wrong”…
Secondly, due to the first, the significant reduction of curatorial support of the platforms: of the repeated “reminder” platforming every 4 or 6 months, with all the requirements for installations, personnel, “invitations” to victims, waiting times, recording sheets…
Third, the relief from the necessity of the maximum number of victims / experimental animals. Technical conclusions emerged from the “first wave”. The “second wave” of related R&B can proceed with smaller “samples”…
Fourth, the relative avoidance of projecting the evolution (of the “second wave”) into the broader public view, which has become hostile towards this “new technology” due to the massive lethal and/or disruptive consequences of the first.
Fifth, through the (relative) distancing between entrepreneurial profitability and the state-sponsored design of the bio-information-military complex, the exposure of theories concerning both “depopulation” and “corporate greed”…
If the “first wave” converted millions of cells of various organs of the human body (millions of human bodies!) into agents of illness, into viruses, forcing the immune system to attack them, destroying organs and tissues, even to death, the “second wave”, the replicon, makes a technological, qualitative (and ultimately political, by our understanding of “political”) leap: it makes the hacking of cells deliberately permanent and lasting! The same goes for the deadly illness!
Someone might wonder here: but do they want to make the pedestrians die or suffer serious and permanent injuries at a rate of 70%, as has already happened to those who were “platformed” with replicon in Japan. Our answer is: no. These are “collateral losses” during an experiment that will also have a “third wave,” and a “fourth wave”… (On the other hand, their pedestrians, as well as all their citizens, are considered expendable…) Ultimately, they don’t test the “second wave”… on their own armies!!! They mainly test it on the “vulnerable population groups” (on the elderly…) who are considered more of a “burden” and “exit” from a capitalist perspective…
On the other hand, at least two of DARPA’s “research programs” indicate how harmoniously the “second wave” fits into military methodologies. Both concern permanent genetic modifications as a means of protecting the American military from biological weapons and infectious diseases, as van der Pijl reminded in April 2020.
One (we have referred to this before) is called Living Foundries. Living foundries. The purpose of the program is the permanent hacking of cells, tissues and organisms (humans are not excluded!) in order to produce specific types of protein on demand. According to the presentation of DARPA itself:
… The Living Foundries program aims to make adaptable, scalable, and on-demand protein production feasible through programming the fundamental metabolic processes of biological systems… Through Living Foundries, DARPA is transforming synthetic biology into a predictable engineering practice that supports a broad range of national security objectives…
The replicon, the self-replicating mRNA platforms within cells, do exactly this: they force cells to produce the selected (viral) protein instead of their own for an extended period of time, at least a year.
The other one is called Gene Drive. It involves the imposition of heritable genetic mutations! This program has two legs. On one hand, the creation of suitable, convenient, useful “super-species”, in any animal species deemed useful… (The army is such a species…) On the other hand, the destruction of other species considered useless or dangerous. (Enemies are such a species…) In both cases, the mutations (and the mRNA platforms do exactly this: they mutate the function of organisms) must be as long-lasting as possible. A small excerpt from cyborg 23 (gene drive: designed genetic alienation):
…
These two good people, researchers and geneticists, Austin Burt and Andrea Crisanti, had been hired by the American DARPA for 2.5 million dollars, to develop their technique – the second one publicly admitted it. For DARPA, rounded formulations are not needed. The issue of gene drive does not arise for these specific genetic mutations. Their name is genetic extinction. DARPA’s interest is in how critical animal species of adversaries (bees, birds, plants, even animals) will be genetically modified in a way that the mutations are inherited, so that adversaries are left “unwarned” of basic food species.DARPA is the primary funder of these research efforts, experiments, and whatever applications have been made so far. According to the establishment’s guardian, by 2017 it had invested 100 million dollars in genetic extinction technologies. And because such technologies could be possessed and used by enemies, or because there could be some kind of genetic detonation, DARPA is also investing in genetic repair research. This program is called “safe genes.” The idea here is just as paranoid as that of genetic extinction: in addition to “destructive genes,” “reserve genes” would be introduced into various organisms, which would neutralize the “destructive” ones if something goes wrong…
Beyond these expenses, DARPA is doing a few more things. It pays English specialists with old colonial ties to Africa, so that African communities will agree to become gene drive mosquito test subjects.
The second major funder is (did it slip your mind?) the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Of course, the foundation’s grantees are not only geneticists. They are also journalists, politicians, academics, and influencers in general. They are needed. “Emerging Ag,” a private public relations firm focused on agricultural restructuring, was hired on behalf of the Lord of Doors and Windows for 1.6 million dollars to promote “genetically friendly scientists” to various international organizations dealing with the issue, to bribe academics and government officials to resist proposals for restricting or even banning their applications, to bribe well-known journalists to expose their benefits, and other such pastoral and household matters. “Emerging Ag” managed to recruit over 65 experts, including government officials and academics as well as 3 experts from the WHO committee on the issue, to “flood” any international process against gene drives with the suffocating dung of “science.” Whatever was done with the mRNA platforms, just still in an initial stage.
…
epilogue (always temporary): that critical mistake
The abandonment of care for how mRNA platforms “work” during the health terror campaign and the mass, dictatorial imposition of the “first wave” was a big mistake. Which has causes; it also has consequences.
Even as late as the 1980s, such issues were not only easily accessible to the broader “educated” segments of Western societies, but the relevant knowledge was also additionally desirable. For obvious reasons (then, but no longer today). Consequently, competitive movements and related groups (against mutants back then) had a good understanding, on one hand, of how dangerous it is to “tamper with cells” while playing the role of a (minor) “god,” and on the other hand, of who pushes the destructive potential of biotechnologies and why. At that time, the relevant “experts” were not at all the “wise” ones from whom we should respectfully keep our distance. It was the opposite: they were the vanguards of the enemy. Of capitalism.
The data has changed – unfortunately for the much worse. We have an assessment of the causes, but this is not the place to present it. What is certain is that the applied and applicable technological developments of the bio-information-military complex are simply considered another “bad news” package in everyday lives already stripped bare by “bad news”.
Under these conditions, the first and necessary thing that is needed is the same as what was always needed: knowledge. Even if, by itself, it is not yet capable of effectively preventing the destructive consequences of paradigm change (in general) and capitalist, militaristic biotechnological colonization of all forms of life (specifically), it is sine qua non.
Ziggy Stardust
- Cyborg no 31, replicon: the acceleration of the biotechnological breakthrough. ↩︎
- Indicatively, the impressive advance announcement of the “blowing up in the air” of any control system of the pharmaceutical mafia’s “products”, in October 2019, at https://alicetv.net/w/ba5Lcp1w3hwxB2LzCez1zJ ↩︎
- Marching Plague (2006). The book was written by CAE largely because in 2004 one of the group’s founding members, Steve Kurtz, was charged with “bioterrorism” because the FBI found biological laboratory equipment at his home. The court quickly acquitted Kurtz, however the FBI kept the case “open” until 2008, when the file was permanently closed.
In Greek: The March of the Plague, (2007) from the 21st Century Spy Club. ↩︎ - It came into force in 1975. It has been signed by 189 states. Ten states have not. The most “serious” among them is the theocratic, apartheid regime, the butcher of Palestinians and not only… ↩︎