Set aside, for a moment, everything you know about the hygiene terror campaign. And watch the video below, which is 1.5 minutes long. You may need to watch it again, perhaps even a third time – you won’t believe your eyes. We will then help you by explaining.
First of all, the credits. Apart from the journalist and Fauci, the third person speaking is Rick Bright, former director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA). BARDA is a service of the American Department of Health, primarily responsible for countermeasures against bioterrorism and, additionally, for influenza pandemics or new viral outbreaks.
This is an event of the Milken Institute. This “store” was created in 1991 by former banker Michael Milken, who became known as a pioneer in the creation and use of “junk bonds”, the financial market products / garbage, while he was sentenced to imprisonment for violating securities legislation. His “institute”, a typical example of the American mafia-style money laundering, appears as a think tank that deals with “solving social problems through financial innovations and market laws” with an emphasis on “human capital.”
The “conference on the future of health” took place on October 28, 29 and 30, 2019. Among the sponsors were pharmaceutical companies such as Genentech (a subsidiary of Roche), Merck, Pfizer, Heron…
Among the many parallel workshops and lectures that took place over the 3 days (with a thousand participants…) there were topics such as “New technologies that turbo-change the evolution of medicine”, “Activating artificial intelligence in research and applications of biopharmaceutical companies”, “The power of data in prevention, prediction and personalization of healthcare”, “Redefining philanthropic drug discovery”, “2.0 therapies of the 21st century”, etc. In short, this was not a secret meeting of conspirators, but rather a (yet another) central public appointment of all stakeholders in the health industry in view (at that time) of the great leap of the 4th industrial revolution. Among the speakers, apart from dozens of CEOs and owners of various types of companies (pharmaceutical, insurance, fintech) and academics/researchers, there were ministers of the cannabis cabinet (health, urban development…) senators, MPs… All the good people.
(It is the reality that various foolish or corrupt anonymous influencers carabinieri and pfizerians refuse to admit that they serve.)
This particular video is a montage of 2 excerpts from the discussion on the topic “Beyond the flu: the search for a global vaccine”, which took place on October 29, 2019. Meanwhile, quite coincidentally, the aforementioned conference started 10 days after another significant event, a “deadly coronavirus pandemic” exercise, which took place on October 18, 2019 in New York, organized by the “World Economic Forum”, the “Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation”, and the ever-present “John Hopkins Center for Health Security”. We are referring to “event 201“.
Completely symptomatically? As the end of 2019 approached, the Western overlords of the bioinformatics-security complex felt increasingly suffocated because they were falling behind in capturing the social factory, while their Asian opponent was advancing… A suffocation that they managed with increasingly frequent (and propagandistic) preparations for the “big debut”…
And now to the main topic. The establishment advocates who are called “fact checkers” tried to exonerate Fauci and Bright… Nowhere during the discussion did they make any comment that would indicate a plan for “mass social intimidation” using a “new virus” wrote the “fact checkers” on June 10, 2021, after the discovery of this specific event and the publication of its video.
Indeed… The word “fear” is not mentioned clearly… After the journalist’s impressive “position” regarding the “collapse of the healthcare system,” the two “experts” speak about dismantling the existing (up to 2019) system of diagnostics and vaccine therapies; they speak about the obstacles created by the “old way” of classical and effective vaccines (the inactivated viruses of traditional vaccines were produced in eggs); they admit that if safety rules are applied to a “new vaccine,” it would take 10 years to reach the market (so these rules must be loosened for the story of the safety of genetic interventions to end…); they don’t explicitly refer to genetic engineering as the “future,” but it’s clear that this is what they mean; they ultimately refer, albeit slightly veiled, to creating a “shock” that will convert the RNA ‘of a new virus emerging from China’ (what a diabolical coincidence!!!) into ‘new-type vaccines’ (like “patches,” as Bright imagines them…)
Indeed, in the mouth of this former high-ranking state official, the term “new virus” does not necessarily mean coronavirus. It could refer to a “new flu virus,” since after all, the topic of discussion was “getting over the flu.” However, having Fauci right next to him, it is inconceivable that he was unaware that this particular mafia boss was deeply involved in experiments transforming coronaviruses into weapons (and) at the Wuhan biological laboratory… Moreover, they had dealt just days earlier with a coronavirus pandemic in “event 201,” although it was not of Chinese origin. It is inconceivable that Bright did not follow this specific “exercise.”
What was being discussed, nicely and handsomely, on October 29, 2019, is what you can read in detail in the upcoming cyborg 22 in a text about “coronavirus patents”: because the flu was and is extremely familiar to populations, the attempt at global technological enforcement through shock surrounding a flu virus had insurmountable social limits. (It essentially failed twice, in 2003 and 2009). The technologically “new” thing to be universally imposed (as a “global vaccine”…) needed a “new pretext”, one that the demagogues of the bioinformatics-security complex could tell the subordinates (“from within”, that is, as “experts”) … we don’t care what your perception is, we will define the problem… in a disruptive and repetitive manner… (because both are needed…) Like carpet bombing, as the marginal relentless machine would say.
The appropriate “new pretext” could only be constructed around “something” that would be presented as “new, unknown, deadly” – while in reality it was old, known, patented, and not particularly dangerous…
If the above seem to you to correspond to the content of what you saw and heard in 1.5 minutes, put back in their place what you know and have / we have experienced and live with the hygiene terror campaign.
They match perfectly… Don’t they?