Could radioactivity be less harmful than we think? Wildlife has “returned” next to the concrete shell of the Chernobyl nuclear plant in Ukraine, which 30 years ago became a nightmare for Europe and a symbol of vindication for the European (and global) anti-nuclear movement.
There are, however, people suffering from arthritis, asthma, or psoriasis who insist that bathing in radioactive springs does them good. A study conducted under the auspices of the German Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research, based in Darmstadt, seems to vindicate them. “Mild” radioactivity increases bone mass and improves the immune system, the research found… The fact is that in the late 19th and early 20th centuries (with the knowledge of the time), the same medical view existed: radioactivity is beneficial. This refers to natural radioactivity: atomic bombs (or collapsing nuclear power plants) are not included in medical prescriptions.
If we mention the relevant “revision,” it is not because we believe it is either right or wrong. It is because it is an example of changes of opinion (changes of “Truth”) within the circles of scientists and experts. Changes that are always made with the proper tone and authority; yet they could easily drive an elephant insane, should it happen to be a “believer.”
(In the photo, the damaged control center of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant).