Maintaining our political criticism, whether in the terror campaign surrounding covid-19, or in the “medical body” that lends its authority to neocapitalism, we find it wrong to omit the medical objections (strong, backed by scientific implications) that shatter the TINA (There Is No Alternative) of this systematic terrorism. Does this mean, perhaps, that we are discovering the “saints” within the abyss? No! We are showing the “scientific” relativity (possibly even duplicity) of the medical-state “truths” that legitimize martial law amid a dense fog of fear-mongering. Ultimately, we demonstrate that what appears before us as an unshakable “medical truth” is far more a political choice (of “doctors”) than they would care to admit. And this becomes clear when everyone learns of the alternative “scientific / medical” viewpoint.
And since these notorious “medical truths” are from their very inception political, not only “medical” but also pure-blood political criticisms have every reason and right. Whoever, with impudence, would try to silence us with the argument “are you doctors?” let them see and hear below yet another such example.
Sucharit Bhakdi (unknown to us! thank you S.) must have a certain status in Germany. Such that allows him to address Merkel without being ridiculed. He moves on the same wavelength as G. Ioannidis, and (from what we read in international philology) with an increasing number of first-class western epidemiologists, infectious disease specialists and other similar experts, who understand that the sanitarian police (about which we wrote yesterday, and will return to) has nothing to do with the “real” reality of any epidemic. And they are worried. They understand that the sanitarian military law will worsen the situation of millions of citizens in the medium term, not only in the psycho-emotional sphere, but even in that of covid-19 itself and “infection”: if diseases were dealt with by police and the military, then the two world wars would have made Europe a “health monster”… (The relentless machine does not mean at all this deterioration as an “accident”, as “collateral damage”… It considers it a target… More soon).
Sucharit Bhakdi sent an open letter to Merkel on March 26 challenging her against the restrictive measures in Germany (which are still “milder” compared to Greece, Italy, France, and Spain…) In the subtitled (from English) 14-minute video that follows, three days ago, he repeats his questions to the central German political establishment, somewhat more analytically.
Everyone can say: aaaaa… two doctors, three opinions! But because we are now talking about lives, and moreover not about the lives of seriously ill patients (those are not affected by the military law) but about the lives of all the rest, the second (and the third…) opinion is of particular importance…