Was the virus a “human creation”? And if so, whose? And if so, did it accidentally escape from its creator? Or was it released on purpose?
It is a kind of miracle of establishment propaganda that the priests and chief justices of the indictment for “conspiracy” against all those who dared to question the “truths” about coronavirus murders are throwing their own heavy conspiracy theory back onto the scene. Seeking to be a megaton bomb. “Sars-CoV-2 escaped from the Wuhan biological laboratory,” say the conspiracy experts in Washington. “By accident.” They do not attribute intent, but they are ready to draw up an indictment for the murder of millions through negligence.
Beijing, for its part, has its own theory: the chapin was brought along by some of the 200 American military athletes who participated in the military Olympic games in Wuhan between October 18 and 27; therefore, they had caught it somewhere in America; therefore, it escaped from some American biological laboratory.
A year later, and after the findings of a special WHO committee that investigated the matter in Wuhan concluded that the virus is not a product of genetic engineering, therefore it came directly (but unknown how) from mother nature (from bats, that is), the confrontation between state conspiracy theories will not be a “fair match”! Washington, which has the initiative of the “revelations”, does not seek to have its theory accepted by everyone. It just wants to be able to use it itself and its allies. To corner the Chinese regime by demanding compensation with many, very many zeros, which Beijing will naturally refuse, along with the indictment and the alleged “evidence”… And then “the organs will start”!…
We had the “audacity” from the beginning to support that not the insignificant jester himself, but his management was / is a field of geopolitical confrontation between Western states / capitalisms and the Chinese one. We explained various aspects of this management that seemed “mysterious” on this canvas.1 The fact that now the issue of the origin of Sars-CoV-2 appears openly as such a kind of conflict, officially and clearly, justifies our opinion; and it ridicules all the obedient little soldiers of the war against the invisible enemy, proving that they are much worse intellectually and morally than the recruits of various European states who in the summer of 1914 were setting off all cheerful for the front… only to quickly realize that they were simply, cannon fodder, filling the European soil with their bodies… Now no one wants to admit that for the bosses “we are all potentially cannon fodder for…”
The geopolitical conflict over the management of the pandemic (that is, mainly the subjugated populations in the West) is merely the continuation of the conflict of state research for biological weapons, with other means!!! Indeed, the only possibility of a genetically constructed virus (regardless of whether it originates from a Chinese or American or any other laboratory) stems from military research on the weaponization of viruses and microbes! It is the technological arms of armies that are particularly interested in “microorganisms of enhanced lethality,” as well as in “genetic engineering vaccines” – not Hippocrates and Asclepius!!!
Therefore, whoever speaks of a “constructed virus” is simultaneously speaking of two things. First, of the biotechnological capabilities to deliberately mutate the cells of viruses, bacteria (but, of course, also of humans)… And second, of the militaristic character of these biotechnological capabilities, which means military funding legitimized under titles such as “for the protection of public health in the event of a lethal pandemic” – so that populations may feel the warmth of the state’s/military embrace….
To put it another way. Whether a virus is “manufactured” by biotechnologists or not, the response to it in the West WAS FROM THE BEGINNING manufactured, as we have entered the “4th industrial revolution”; not along the lines of care for the “good of people,” but along the lines of military (or even warlike) action; which naturally leaves all profit margins for companies, and control over societies for states. Consequently, whoever speaks of “manufacturing” instead of yet another natural process (regarding the creation of a virus) inadvertently reveals the innards of capitalist militarism.
In the end, the state/capitalist management of a “pandemic” (or the creation of the myth of such) is now the “peaceful version” of war capabilities and preparations.
Engineering viruses
On December 19, 2017, the establishment New York Times jubilantly informed their audience that the Federal Ban on Creating Killer Viruses was lifted. The report that followed could today (;) be considered chilling, especially regarding the use of certain terms (which the naive consider “humanitarian”…) – but back then it went unnoticed. Our emphasis:
Federal officials ended on Tuesday a moratorium imposed three years ago, banning funding for research on modifying microorganisms to make them more deadly.
Such work can now proceed, declared Dr. Francis S. Collins, head of the National Institutes of Health [NIH, one of the key “guides in tackling the pandemic”…], but only if a scientific committee decides that the benefits justify the risks.
Some scientists are eager to pursue such research because it may reveal, for example, how a bird flu virus could mutate to more easily infect humans or provide insight into building a better vaccine.
Critics argue that these researchers risk creating a monster microorganism that could escape from the lab and trigger a pandemic.
…
In October 2014, all federal funding ceased for efforts to mutate three viruses to make them more dangerous: the flu virus, the virus that causes Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), and the virus that causes Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) [the latter two are coronaviruses, relatives of the common cold virus…]
However, the new regulations concern any pathogen that could potentially cause a pandemic. For example, they could apply to a request to create an airborne version of the Ebola virus, said Dr. Collins.
There have been long-standing and intense disagreements over plans—known as “gain of function” [a term referring to research that worsens a disease…]—aimed at making pathogens more deadly or more transmissible.
In 2011, an outcry erupted when it was learned that laboratories in Wisconsin and the Netherlands were attempting to mutate the H5N1 avian flu virus, making it easily transmissible among mammals so that, in this way, human susceptibility to mutation could be studied.
…
When the moratorium was imposed, it led to the suspension of 21 such projects, says Dr. Collins. In the three years since then, the NIH made exceptions that allowed funding for ten such projects. Five of them were related to flu viruses, and the other five concerned the MERS virus.
…
At the end of December 2017, the American state (with a president who was a known advocate for such research…) launched another significant opening salvo, allowing federal funding for the construction of more lethal or more transmissible flu or coronavirus strains… for “good purposes”… With strict safety measures supposedly in place, so that these small masterpieces of biotechnological militarism would not begin careers without higher orders. The “go big” approach, however, only concerned the expiration of the three-year pause in “central” funding; anyone else who had money to push such research could do so. Rest assured that they did.
What had happened however that led to this three-year “suspension of funding” for such advanced research on the part of the American federal government?
Dr. Christina Lin, who is simultaneously a foreign policy advisor to various prominent American think tanks and specializes in “weapons of mass destruction,” explains in an article of hers from April 2020 (the emphasis is ours):
… In October 2014, the American government imposed a moratorium on gain-of-function research partly due to accidents in CDC laboratories in July 2014, which raised questions about biosafety in American high-risk laboratories.
At that time, the CDC had closed two laboratories and stopped transporting biological agents due to various incidents where highly pathogenic microbes had not been properly handled by federal laboratories: an accidental shipment of live anthrax spores; the discovery of forgotten live smallpox samples, and a more recent incident where a dangerous flu strain was mistakenly sent by the CDC to another laboratory.
Obviously, the American government (Obama) then feared that the leakage of serious pathogenic organisms from military biotechnology experiments within America could cause serious, very serious problems within the USA… The American army and its collaborators have scattered quite a few such biological warfare laboratories at various points on the planet; so, then, why not conduct such dangerous “research” there?
Ms. Lin continues immediately afterwards (the emphasis is always ours):
… Due to this moratorium in the US, Dr. Anthony Fauci – director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) and current head of the Task Force against coronavirus in the US – decided to outsource gain-of-function research to the Chinese laboratory in Wuhan and ensured that this particular laboratory continued to receive American federal funding…
Isn’t he a beauty? Yes, it’s the well-known Mr. Anthony Fauci, the “fear tsar” in relation to the plague; the accomplice in the use of the deadly AZT against HIV-positive people worldwide in the early ’90s… He had arranged for the outsourcing of research (and genetic experiments) on coronaviruses from bats to Wuhan, because it was banned in the US… Of course, back then, in 2014 and 2015, Beijing had not yet become such a significant, such an intense strategic threat to Washington—thus, this kind of “collaborations” solved problems (and hands) for the American bio-militarism…
However, what does the highly pivotal involvement of Mr. Fauci (and obviously others, under his orders and directives…) simultaneously in genetic modification research of influenza and coronavirus viruses and in the “pandemic management” demonstrate, if not the dual military/political character of modern capitalist biopolitics? And what does the strong militaristic presence “behind the scenes” in public health issues demonstrate, if not that “pandemic management” in the Western world had little to do with reality (and public health) and much to do with the “exercise” of biological warfare (beyond everything else we have emphasized again and again)?
Geopolitics
Whether it escaped from a laboratory or from bats, the emergence of the “chapin” (a colloquial term for the virus) in Wuhan forced (or gave the opportunity to) the Chinese regime to initially treat the situation as a case of biological warfare! It didn’t explicitly say so; however, all the measures that impressed the West—from strict military-like laws and bans to the rapid construction of recovery centers within a week—were exactly what one would do in such a scenario. Biological warfare. When it became clear (and this happened quickly…) that Sars-CoV-2 is relatively non-lethal, it effectively addressed it for what it truly was, using different, non-military means (which were decisively rejected by the Western authorities of the bio-info-security complex and their various agents).
The exact opposite occurred in Western states, with various smaller or larger variations on the same model: long-term sanitary coups. No epidemic is dealt with in such a way; however, other pressing issues are being addressed (or that’s what the authorities of the complex hope): from the excessive liberalism of Western societies to the violent push (of the same societies) toward the norms of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, so as not to permanently lose the overall technological competition with Chinese capitalism.
And since the competition between Western capitalisms and Chinese capitalism, over the course of a year, took the form of Beijing saying “we deal with the chapin and quickly sort it out,” while the West said “we deal with China by trying to copy its social control and technologically outflank it,” it couldn’t help but continue!
Would it be convenient for the creative death accounting and the “common pools,” having been used as terror weapons against Western populations, to also be used as weapons against the rival? Why not? Would it be convenient for “China to be to blame”? Why not? An intelligence assessment is needed—and continuation in the courts… Especially if Western genetic engineering kills mercilessly whatever it touches…
Ultimately: did the chapin escape or not? From China or from America? Maybe it’s old and nobody had noticed, or maybe Dr. Fauci made it to help his friend Gates? Hmmmm… In these harsh times, nobody is looking for the truth—it’s become a joke. Everyone is looking for something to sell in a “truth packaging”… No matter how much it displeases fans of cheap sanitary and/or geopolitical drama (amidst the 4th World War), the answer depends on another question:
What exactly are you looking for? Compensation, a blockbuster scenario, the meaning of life, a cause for interstate war—or your class enemy?
Ziggy Stardust
Demagogues don’t camouflage for free; they never have!…
