…The «strategic technologies researcher» of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) warns with a report that China is ahead of the US in 37 out of 44 technologies that are very likely to drive innovation, development and military power in the coming decades… The key areas dominated by China are drones, machine learning, electric batteries, nuclear energy, photovoltaics, quantum sensors, strategic mineral processing, robotics, space, and energy… China’s dominance in certain sectors is so embedded in its economy that the 10 global leading research institutes in these areas are all located in this country…
The ASPI report says that the US is the leading innovator in only 7 technologies – including quantum computers and vaccines – and is second, behind China, in most of the remaining categories. “In the long term, China’s leadership in research means that it has the capability not only to pioneer current technological development in almost all sectors, but also in future technologies that do not currently exist,” the ASPI report commented…
These and similar things could someone have read almost a year ago, in March 2023, in various international media. Not just alarming for Western capitalists; terrorist!
The history of capitalism (already since the 1st industrial revolution) is interwoven with technological innovations (improvements in the extraction of surplus value!) that provide advantages to some, causing disadvantages to their competitors. Obviously, it is not enough to formulate one or more “new ideas” around technological applications that can increase profits in some research centers. Money is also needed to be installed (: primitive accumulation), individuals who will be trained to handle these innovations (: specialized and unskilled labor), an initial critical market size to sell the production (: realization of surplus value), and the fastest possible repetition of this cycle, so that each time the “new technologies” are established (along with their inventors…), to determine the standards – and the profit rate. But these are not consolations for Western bosses: Chinese capitalism has everything in quantity and quality that is unmatched; and even more.
The number (and types) of patents (: “intellectual property”) is considered a measure of the “national” competitiveness and innovation of the planet’s capitalisms (although capital has no homeland, capital – a relationship of exploitation, the capitalists have or, according to their interests, choose to have). Chinese capitalism in 2000 had won very few patents from the competent American office. In 2015 it reached the American number (300,000) and since then has surpassed it with a continuously and strongly upward trend.
Consequently, there is little room and little time left for the Western bosses to brake this incredible techno-scientific onslaught, which they neither knew was possible to occur so quickly, nor expected to find so forcefully challenging their global hegemony.
What can be done now? What could be done? Only to use intensively (even violently…) the technologies and sectors where Western capitalisms still have some comparative advantage. Only to make these technologies (or some of them), with these owners (the Western ones), manage to impose themselves globally, determining international standards for their own benefit; to establish themselves by controlling as much as possible.
Back to ASPI’s research: one of the 7 technologies in which Western capitalisms considered (in 2023…) that they still possessed a technological advantage and priority, is vaccines… Or, more correctly, whatever is still called a “vaccine” in the West. The same assessment existed 5 years earlier: Western, and especially American, pharmaceutical industry as a whole was by far the largest on the planet.
Something similar was happening (and is still happening to some extent) in the field of medical equipment and devices.
Olophano: in the entire sector called “health industry” the western capitalisms (with the American as leader) had (in 2018…) and consider that they continue to have (in 2023…) a unique advantage of global supremacy!!! It is one of the seven sectors that remain… (Not forever, and perhaps not for much longer: Chinese capitalism is thunderous…) Therefore, the (western) “health industry” can (and should!) become a combination of castle and battering ram: if not for the overall containment of the general techno-scientific Chinese capitalist supremacy, certainly for its limitation and strategic erosion…
However, for this to happen, all institutions and para-institutions, state, para-state and private, that promote involvement in “global health” and have been recognized as such, these institutions therefore will have to not only be bought by the western “health industry” (this is already happening to a large extent) but also to acquire full authority (on health issues and anything related to them) across the entire planet: to determine the tactics, the strategies, the standards, the actions, “the fears and the salvations” that suit, that serve the western “health industry” – and not only this one.
In order for the flags of the Western “health industry” to be nailed from one end of the planet to the other; in order to be secured there so well that they will flutter for the coming decades; and in order to be established without serious technological competition, two elements at least would be needed (are needed…). First, a “central global headquarters” under absolute Western control. And second, a “technology in the name of health” which competitors do not possess, certainly not Chinese capitalism.
The first one existed and exists. It is called the “World Health Organization” / W.H.O…. The second one was imposed. It is called genetic engineering. The W.H.O. would undertake (undertakes) the “construction of the problem” and the terms for its resolution; terms and ways, of course, that fit and serve the interests of the Western “health industry” and overall the bio-information-security complex…
The W.H.O. could (and can) do this job… It is the most official international institution to take an epidemic and declare it a pandemic!… A public health emergency situation…
It had already conducted a “trial.” In 2009 with the “swine flu.”
Since 2003, the first paragraph of the WHO website on “Pandemic Preparedness” was as follows:
An influenza pandemic occurs when a new flu virus emerges, against which the human population has no immunity, causing the outbreak of several simultaneous epidemics around the world with a significant number of deaths and illnesses.
However, on May 4, 2009, just one month before the WHO declared the emergence of H1N1 (swine flu) a “pandemic,” this front page changed afterward, supposedly at the request of a CNN journalist (an “explanation” that stank…). The words “with a significant number of deaths and illnesses” disappeared and the definition changed to:
An influenza epidemic can occur when a new flu virus emerges, against which the human population has no immunity.
The change was scandalous and obviously suspicious. The “swine flu pandemic” was naturally declared, with unlimited apocalyptic predictions of millions of dead and the end of the world (unless). The protagonist was a “prophet” who should have been condemned already from then to break stones; however, he remained in his post and repeated his prophecies in 2020. His name is Neil Ferguson.
All the “scientific means” were mobilized to save the planet: from reminders of the Spanish flu to computational models… And of course the “political means”: willing ministers from various European governments, or even entire governments. (The then Greek health minister was called Avramopoulos and his close advisor was called Tsiorvas…) Thus, for example, the London health ministry announced that it expected 65,000 deaths. After a few months of “pandemic,” in early 2010, deaths were fewer than 1,000, a number lower than the average for usual seasonal flu periods.
The “unless” was, of course, the “life-saving flu vaccines.” Tamiflu was the most famous, although not the only one. Millions of doses were ordered in 2009 and paid for – only to be thrown away the following summer when no deadly cases emerged, and the vaccines were not made. A European body, official indeed but not at the center of the institutional galaxy, the “Council of Europe” (no relation to the meetings of EU political leaders – it is a body of parliamentary delegations from all European states, whether they are or are not members of the EU) did not sit idle. It investigated the scandal, and discovered that most WHO advisors were double agents: they worked as executives in pharmaceutical companies…
These were happening in the E.U., with the E.U., from the E.U. then. In 2009. We return therefore, it is mandatory, to the year 0 of the great, imperialist attack of the western “health industry” on the entire planet. To 2020. The year 0 of covid-19.
2020
According to the official announcement of the Hellenic Police:
Cases of the “novel coronavirus” (nCoV) were initially detected in China in December 2019, with the virus spreading rapidly to other countries around the world. This led the WHO to declare on January 30, 2020, a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), and to characterize the issue as a pandemic on March 11, 2020.
On January 30, 2020, the declared deaths due to severe symptoms (pneumonia) attributed to the still “anonymous” (nCoV) virus were globally 171 (in full: one hundred and seventy-one), a number rather insignificant to declare the first phase of a “public health emergency”… On March 11, when the declaration of “public health emergency” by the WHO was completed, 4,925 cases were reported (3,162 within China)… Paradoxical or not, the overwhelming majority of deaths outside China were concentrated in just 6 western countries (in order: Italy, South Korea, France, Spain, Germany, USA) and Iran…
Moreover, another paradox or not, there had appeared that case which from a scientific point of view would be considered ideal for studying the virulence of the “new coronavirus”: the cases on the cruise ship Diamond Princess: an isolated population, the vast majority of whom were elderly… The ship remained quarantined for two weeks outside the Japanese port of Naha, in Okinawa. There, among the 3,711 quarantined individuals (2,666 passengers and 1,045 crew members), a total of 696 cases were recorded and there were 7 (in full: seven) deaths from pneumonia, all elderly with underlying conditions. Mortality, therefore, 1%, in the most burdened age group.
The final recording on the Diamond Princess had been completed on February 15, 2020, almost a month BEFORE the WHO’s pandemic declaration. And yet: the “central headquarters” of public health protection (already bought by the Western industry at that time) completely ignored the 1% fatality rate (and moreover, in the most burdened age group) in an ideal case (for studying all characteristics of Sars-CoV-2 transmission, etc.), and declared a pandemic with an estimated fatality rate of 3.5%!!!
“Estimated”? Intended? What is certain is that the “central headquarters” did its job, causing with just one statement (with its authority and “prediction”…) a dramatic global health emergency situation – cut and sewn exactly to the measures of its masters, the Western “health industry”, with the blatant aim of firmly planting their flags all over the planet…
To the whole world? Not exactly. On March 11, 2020, almost 2 months had passed since the Chinese state/capital had managed Sars-CoV-2, mainly in the province of Wuhan. It had managed it with police/repressive means (mass house arrests of millions of residents in the area) but also with medical/therapeutic means. Chinese “medical/therapeutic means,” and moreover successful ones, against a virus of limited significance that was about to be used by the Western “health industry” as the flag of its campaign for genetic/informational conquest of the planet? Unthinkable!!!
How many times did that “spokesperson” of the conglomerate called Bill Gates loudly declare, boasting, that we have to vaccinate 7.5 billion people? How many times throughout 2020 did the “headquarters,” the WHO, change the definition of herd immunity to eliminate any other medical possibility (and, primarily, knowledge) except for the upcoming genetic engineering platforms? [The data below, as well as at other points in this report, come from the tireless machine.]
On June 9, 2020, the definition was this (from the official site of the “organization”):
Herd immunity is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that is achieved when a population has immunity either through vaccination or through immunity developed via previous infection.
The definition was the well-known, established one for many decades – which is why it was particularly brief. It would not teach anyone anything new.
On November 13, the definition had changed radically. Natural immunity had disappeared completely, and the only “recognized” immunity was through vaccinations:
The “herd immunity” [note: this time in quotation marks…], also known as “population immunity”, is a concept used in vaccination, according to which a population can be protected from a specific virus if a vaccination threshold is achieved. Herd immunity [note: without quotation marks…] is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it…
It was absolutely clear what this change was serving…
By the end of 2020, the formulations of the definition were revised for the third time, now slightly, and the relevant reference grew even more; since, as it appears, even more “POU arguments” had to be given to the states and bosses who intend, at some point in the not distant future, to make the platforms compulsory…
What was the new poem of the bureaucracy of the Hellenic Organization for Health Care Provision (EOPYY), which was bought by the big pharma?
“Herd immunity”, also known as “population immunity”, is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that is achieved when a population has immunity either through vaccination or through immunity developed via previous infection….
Up to this point, it was a matter of copying the well-known, old, and established definition as it existed on June 9, with the addition of “also known as ‘herd immunity'” and the introductory phrases to the words herd immunity… And immediately afterward, the downpour began:
WHO supports achieving “herd immunity” through vaccination, not by allowing a disease to spread throughout the population, as such a scenario would result in unnecessary cases and deaths. Herd immunity against covid-19 should be achieved by protecting people through vaccination, not by exposing them to the pathogenic (organism) that causes the disease.
And he continued with a hymn to vaccines (that is, to genetic modification platforms), emphasizing that they do what happens naturally… but – and this is crucial – vaccines work without making us sick… In order to proceed to the next item, the “percentage” of the population that needs to be platformized, citing selected examples of other diseases (95%, 80%…) so as to prepare the ground for compulsory platformization.
What happened and this silver-tongued bureaucracy was forced to raise a new banner with the “line”? We don’t know, but we can speculate. The complete disappearance in November (from definition) of natural immunity “bothered” so much the organism as it is (a draft) that it was considered, probably, “counterproductive”!… It seems there were second thoughts, relevant consultations took place, and the conclusion was to refer to natural immunity at the end of December, but only to characterize it immediately afterwards as problematic, dangerous, unacceptable – and “not permitted” by the P.O.U…. Perhaps as a remnant of a primitive era that has been overcome by the civilization of genetic engineering.
How could the opponent, the Chinese state/capital, hinder this campaign, claiming that vaccines of any kind are not even needed at all and that moderate or even severe illnesses from Sars-CoV-2 can be treated with very mild means?
During 2020, far (though not very far) from the impressions and violence of the (western-origin) sanitization terror campaign, under the nose but also beyond the capabilities of the “central command” / WHO at this specific historical phase, a serious, a crucial war developed between the western “health industry” and the Chinese approach to covid-19, which however was very quickly adopted by a large percentage of African and Asian states.
… If we assume that the coronavirus is a cultivation, then Western medicine will focus directly on burning it, while traditional Chinese medicine will take care to neutralize the soil from which this cultivation depends, improving the patient’s overall physical condition…
(Tong Xiaolin, member of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and head of the therapeutic department of the national service of traditional Chinese medicine)
Science is ours and the world must understand it.
(Melissa Fleming, UN Deputy Secretary-General, at Davos 2022)
The “fire in the plantation” is not a medical approach any more than it is a military one… Essentially, the confrontation was not between two formally equivalent “therapeutic viewpoints,” and whoever treats it as such will be mistaken. A therapeutic approach worthy of the name, already tested and effective in practice, was only the Chinese (and subsequently the African) one. On the contrary, the Western “position” was that of an imperialist campaign modeled after the “war on terror” following 2001, this time “anti-viral,” which did not seek public health, but the opposite: the mass and contrived construction of generalized morbidity among populations, through genetic engineering, such that the generalized morbidity could only be managed with genetic engineering again and again – so as to ensure that the technological advantages of the Western “health industry” will dominate the coming decades, holding the planet’s inhabitants hostage, along with “economies,” “raw materials,” etc.
It must be emphasized here that “public health” has been a politically instrumentalized concept/reality in the Western capitalist world for decades! And to a large extent, its clichés, its stereotypes, have passed into the middle social perception.
In 1978 (under political, social and ideological conditions that today seem… prehistoric!!) in Alma-Ata, the capital of Kazakhstan (which at that time was part of the Soviet Union), an international conference was held on Primary Health Care. At that conference, the definition of health was determined and emphasized:
Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.
The incorporation of social and economic factors into the concept of “health,” and the suggestion of complete physical, moral, and social well-being as health, seems today (or in 2020…) “exotic”!!! In 2021, the promise of “salvation” from mRNA platforms began triumphantly with promises of ensuring full immunity/protection, continued with you will get sick but not seriously, progressed to you will get seriously sick but you won’t end up in the hospital, to finally reach you won’t die… This “roller coaster” had no relation not only to the Alma-Ata declaration, but even to the experience of 20th century vaccinations, where the vaccine meant you wouldn’t get sick at all and at all! (Children didn’t get the diphtheria or hepatitis vaccine so they “won’t get seriously sick” or so they “won’t die”!!!)
This “roller coaster,” which was favorably accepted by many millions of citizens, was a triumph of the most naked life that could possibly exist: life without physical, moral, and social well-being; only with probabilities and possibilities of death… It was also a continuous demonstration of what should be considered “health” from now on: basic functionality!
Consequently, the fact that the “pandemic,” from the beginning (its declaration from the “central command” WHO) to the end (end???), was for the western health industry an imperialist campaign to conquer the bodies and lives of 7.5 billion inhabitants of the planet, proved to be a “ripe” work, and was accepted as such by the vast majority of western citizens. At least in a first phase, until the murderous and destructive side effects began to manifest.
However, other regions of the planet, other societies, other states reacted. They reacted instinctively perhaps, but also because they had first-hand knowledge of the murderous “philanthropy” of Western pharmaceutical corporations.
On April 10, 2020, Mrs. Melinda Gates, partner of the spokesperson for the Western bio-info-security complex in his philanthropic activities, with a tearful tone and quivering voice, interviewed on CNN, predicted thousands of deaths from covid in the “developing world” and, specifically, in Africa:
“… They don’t have clean water to wash their hands … their slums are so densely populated that social distancing cannot be applied… Oh my God!… They will be dying in the streets!…”
At the same time, the WHO’s services predicted at least 300,000 deaths from covid-19 in Africa, and rather towards some millions. While the legendary Imperial College of London had preceded in March with a forecast of 3,500,000 deaths (always in Africa). That’s how many they wanted… For Ghana alone, the 70,000 deaths were a “friendly price” on behalf of the western prophets…
But no. By the end of 2020, Africa had not become the vast cemetery that would run on Western mRNA platforms and fall upon syringes while kissing the hands of white saviors. Ghana, with a population of 31.8 million, had only 333 deaths from covid-19 complications… Senegal, with a population of 16.7 million, had 381.. Ivory Coast, with a population of 26.3 million, had 133… Burkina Faso, with a population of 20 million, had either 77…
At the end of 2020, the total number of deaths in Africa attributed to covid-19 was 60,254. This was 11,000 (in full: eleven thousand) fewer than in a single first-world, western state, a member of the EU, NATO, and the G7: Italy, whose death toll and “common pool” had already recorded 70,900 deaths. The difference being that Italy then had a population of 60.4 million, while Africa’s population was 22.5 times larger, at 1.35 billion.
Gates cursed again and again, declaring on camera, disappointed, “I can’t understand what’s happening in Africa”!!! No one wanted to understand “what was happening in Africa”:
The acrobatics have begun! Two things urgently needed to be covered up. First, that Sars-CoV-2 was NOT the killer that had “devoured” Western populations because this suited their bioinformatics-security bosses. And second, that “someone” (a strategic opponent: China) had a more rational, more effective, and clearly milder method of dealing with severe cases; and moreover, without “vaccines,” without genetic engineering.
And so those things that were the disadvantages of African states and would lead them to massacres disappeared from Western demagogy… to be replaced by their opposites. Hmmmm… the populations there are proportionally much younger, so… Hmmmm… probably from many infectious diseases they have developed natural immunity in general… Hmmmm… because they spend many hours in open spaces, in the sun, they have sufficient vitamin D….
The greater part of Africa and a large part of Asia (and Eurasia) was lost to the imperialist campaign of the western “health industry” in 2020, 2021, 2022. Moreover, even the frightened certainty of the globalists that salvation is “vaccines” which in reality are genetic modifications, began to be shaken. The territory of various African states truly became a cemetery, but not for people: for the millions of unused (but well-paid) “doses” of mRNA platforms, which meanwhile expired.
Was this, then, the end of the conflict, of the “health war”? Could the Western masters possibly admit that they lost—not absolutely, but to a considerable degree, especially outside the territories of their states and their demagogues? No.
- Why did we lose?
- Because the P.O.Y. did not have enough authority to recruit and, if necessary, punish all these partisans.
- Well, then let’s give him this power!
Pandemic treaty…
At the beginning of 2022, and after the western “health industry” realized that its campaign had partially succeeded within western territories but largely failed in the rest of the planet, the American state structures of this industry (such as the CDC, etc.) submitted to the WHO a proposal for changes to its constitution, particularly to the “international health regulations” as they had been finalized in 2005, under the name of “enhancing its readiness for public health emergencies.”
The central idea is the institutional entrenchment of the fact that the WHO is a “central command”: it will no longer be merely an advisory body (as it has been until now), but will issue orders (to its member states…) with the clear implication that sanctions will be imposed on those who do not comply, since their “peculiarities” would endanger the rest of the planet… (Article 1).
For example, the aim is for the E.U. (that is, its bureaucracy and its “experts,” those with double jobs…) to require member states to inform it in writing about the type of tests they will conduct on their citizens, proof that member states are implementing the “protective measures” decreed by its experts, proof that they are administering the vaccinations ordered, that they are maintaining quarantines, and so on. Disagreements and objections must be announced within 48 hours at most, with all explanations; but it will be up to the E.U. to decide whether such “justifications” will be taken into account or not. According to this aim, the E.U. will have the right to order an “entry/exit ban” on any “infected” member state or even on any “infected” region within it, without the local authority being able to “disobey” (Article 3).
Moreover, the W.H.O. will have the final say on which “therapeutic” or “preventive” methods are approved and which are not (considered ineffective, unscientific, or even dangerous), and which “means of production” (i.e., which companies…) of the approved methods will undertake the task of saving the world (Article 13A). It is understood that the “quality control” will again be carried out by W.H.O. services, which will also grant the approvals…
The W.H.O. will also impose (here in collaboration with the E.U….) a global digital control/identification system (“universal digital health passport”…) in order to monitor, prohibit or allow cross-border movements of individuals who are either considered “dangerous” or “approved” (after “proper vaccination”…) (Articles 18, 23, 24, 27, 28, 31, 35, 36 and 44). This “digital health” control (always according to the W.H.O. bosses’ appetites) must be continuous and always… “preventive”… Even when there is no confirmed (by the W.H.O.) “global health threat”.
As (the target is) for the WHO to “evolve” into a global manager of everyone’s personal health data, it will be able to “lend” them wherever needed (i.e. to the western “health industry”…) always for the good of humanity and science (Article 45).
And of course, in collaboration with internet companies, the W.H.O. will also deploy its own forces to “combat misinformation”, that is, to censor anyone—individuals or even states—who questions its wisdom, methods, or purposes (Appendix 1).
Finally, the W.H.O. (if it becomes a true “central commander”) will also oversee research on biological warfare (gain-of-function):
…Laboratories and research facilities that conduct research on genetically modified organisms to increase their pathogenicity and transmissibility should have specifications to prevent the accidental release of these pathogens… but such measures should not cause unnecessary administrative obstacles to research…
This is about discouraging the western “health industry”!! All of the above (the details of which are interesting but cannot be disclosed here) if approved by the simple majority of representatives of the 194 member states of the W.H.O., will be merged into a Pandemic Treaty, which will be equally binding as all other similar ones…1
However, is it possible to approve something that will provide the keys to public health and, in essence, many aspects of daily life but also what is called the “economy” of capitalist states, to the showcases of a dozen or so Western “health industries” that are actually manufacturers of organized illness?
There are objections and disagreements (by states and not only) that have been publicly expressed, but also many more that remain underground using the delaying tactic of prolonged “consultations”. The fact that the “pandemic declaration” has become a weapon is clear in countless points of the planet. In a historical period when Western hegemony of the last 5 centuries, in all its forms, colonial, imperialist, politico-economic, is shrinking or even collapsing; in a historical period when the institutions of this hegemony in the 20th century are becoming mere shadows one after the other, the attempt to impose a body controlled directly by the Western bio-information-security complex as the global health police force stems directly from the failures of the 2020 campaign – and these failures are too recent to be forgotten.
Some wonder about the role of Beijing (and) in this “pandemic condition”. The Chinese state/capital does not openly express any opposition, thus creating the idea that it approves this Western salt. However, Beijing follows the same tactic in all the “international” institutions of Western hegemony: on the one hand, it does not openly challenge them; on the other hand, it promotes (and especially internationalizes) its own agenda, its own priorities, alongside and behind these institutions. In short, it promotes a different global system of balances, leaving the existing one to merely try to survive while shrinking2.
Based on the current timeline, the final decision is expected to be made next May; however, we cannot rule out some delay/postponement. But it is already clear, even in hindsight, what happened during the dark triennium 2020–2022; this is what the bosses of the bio-info-security complex are now trying to fully impose and establish as a global norm.
Defeat is a compromising luxury. But at this historic moment it seems impossible for timely, calculable resistance to these “bottom-up” methods to emerge (: this inability is 100% subjective, concerning the intellectual and moral condition of Western populations, both as collectives and as individuals!). At this historic moment, the failure of the Western “health industry’s” “final assault” can mainly be attributed to intra-capitalist competition.
However, there remains an awareness that will be invaluable for each and every one of us from now on: “health,” certainly in Western capitalist societies, is not merely “politicized,” nor only “instrumentalized.” It is, moreover, mobilized – it has become a weapon!! A weapon of domination, a weapon of controlled annihilation…
The correspondence of research and methods for “new drugs” and “new therapies” between the military and non-military sectors of these societies is not coincidental. It is organic3.
It will be suicidal, and indeed for a long duration, to reject this awareness. Those who have and use such weapons will show no mercy.
Ziggy Stardust
- The changes to the WHO constitution are approved by a simple majority of member states, no ratification by each of them is required, and states have the right within 10 months to declare that they do not participate in them; otherwise they automatically apply to them as well. The approval of a pandemic treaty has a different procedure: it must be approved by 2/3 of member states and subsequently approved separately by each state. However, article 35 of the draft under negotiation provides that the treaty may be applied provisionally, before its approval separately by the member states. ↩︎
- Let it be noted that the model promoted by Beijing (and Moscow and many others) is that of a “multipolar world” that sanctifies national-state autonomy; while the transformation of the W.H.O. into a guardian (and prison guard) of “global health” aims at exactly the opposite… ↩︎
- Indicatively: Humans, bats, and the enemy nature (The security complex knows biology… Us?) – cyborg no 28. ↩︎