During the course of the hygiene campaign and the violent imposition of genetic engineering (through mRNA platforms), extensive denial emerged, even from people who were opposed to the campaign, to learn in general terms what exactly these “new technologies” were (and how they “worked”)… even if what was needed was basic school biology.
This rejection manifested hand in hand with the belief that “these are scientific issues, matters for the experts, we have no reason to get involved.” It is not difficult to see here a combination of fatalism and technofetishism. Fatalism because the division of knowledge is a division of power. Technofetishism because blind trust in the benevolence and social benefit of technology (and its experts) forgets that the dramatically greatest generators of technological/scientific developments since the beginning of the 20th century have been capitalist wars; including centrally the First and Second World Wars (but also some “peripheral” ones, such as the war against Vietnam).
Neither of the two, neither mass idolatry nor mass technofetishism can be addressed with one or more references like these alone. What is needed is individual awareness of reality (in an era when reality is systematically and deliberately liquefied to become a universal commodity, while consciousness is increasingly regarded as a mechanical/chemical property that can be better attributed to “smart” machines of all kinds…). We used to say that “fortunately consciousness cannot be sold in pills, because then it would be a state monopoly.” Now we are faced (also) with such a possibility.
The technology (i.e. the political economy) of genetic engineering in general and mRNA platforms in particular has NOT ended, has NOT stopped with the end of the sanitarian terror campaign – as many perhaps believe. On the contrary, it is “getting fiercer”… Even more dangerously, if one can imagine even sicker technoscientific inventions of the contemporary capitalist bio-information-security complex.
First of all, let’s remember how the mRNA platform 1.0 “works” (we’ve already said it: basic knowledge of school biology is desirable!). Under normal conditions, the ribosome (a small particle the size of 20 nm, found in every cell) is the organic “site” for protein synthesis according to the “instructions” it receives from DNA through the so-called “messenger RNA” (messenger RNA / mRNA). The synthesis of proteins in this way is a fundamental activity of living cells of organisms: every organism is, from a narrow biological (: scientific…) point of view, an expression, a manifestation of its proteins, in all their biological manifestations.
For decades, geneticists have been trying to “get their hands” on the DNA of organisms (including human) in order to modify them and force them to send “instructions” for synthesizing different proteins from those that would be synthesized under normal conditions. This “getting hands on” and “modifying” DNA has a well-known name: mutation….
Steps have been made in this technology of alienation / subjugation of living cells / living organisms. The most recent one is called CRISPR/CaS9, and consists of cutting segments of DNA and replacing them with others, foreign («natural» or synthetic…), via an enzyme. Although the method has become commercially famous and «catchy», it has already been documentedly accused for uncontrolled mutations, for «cuts» in the DNA beyond the «desired» targets…
The discovery that instead of “getting into the hands” of DNA, the work of mutation can be done by hijacking the “messenger RNA” (meaning that the same result can be achieved: the synthesis/production of custom proteins…) was a revolution that freed the hands of geneticists and their bosses. The hijacking of normal mRNA, meaning its replacement with foreign mRNA in order to carry foreign “instructions,” seemed (and was) cheaper and easier. At first, theoretically. There were, of course, various serious practical problems: how would it be possible for the foreign, mutagenic “messenger” to reach the cells of a living organism; how would it be possible for it to “pierce” the cell membrane, enter the cytoplasm, and “hit” the ribosome, photocopying the normal “messenger” and forcing it to synthesize/produce a different protein? And even more: what would be the commercial exploitation of this process, whenever technicians managed to complete it?
Efforts and trials were made over the years; essentially unsuccessful. Nanolipids were invented: nano-scale spheres, with various chemical compositions (toxic…) that would play the role of the “envelope”, the “carrier” of the synthetic, pirated “messenger” (mRNA), deceiving the immune system so that it would not react to the invasion of a foreign body into the organism; additionally, they should adhere to the cell membrane, “puncture” it so that the alien “messenger” is “released”/introduced into the cytoplasm, taking over the rest. Essentially, this is what is called infection. But even these, the nanolipids, were (and still are) not at all easy to handle: usually unstable, they must be electrically charged in a specific way, etc. etc.
The attempts at commercial rather than medical exploitation of this highly promising designed challenge of mutations in living organisms (and even in humans) failed for years, even when the orientation became anti-cancer. Suddenly (in reality, not suddenly at all! The circuits of certain pharmaceutical – special – state regulators had been preparing for some time) a harmless virus became the banner for the harsh staging of such a severe “public health emergency” that new technology vaccines (the pseudonym of an already failed genetic technology that was neither “new” nor a “vaccine”) were imposed, causing what those who knew the achievements of genetics feared: an organized, general morbidity – even mortality.
The above is a brief but accurate description of what mRNA platforms are, with minimal specific terminology (: ribosome, proteins). It is sufficient to show that compared to the historical, “traditional” form and function of vaccines, this is exactly the opposite! Vaccines were the introduction of an inactive form of the X virus so that it would be recognized by the immune system and antibodies would be prepared; or, in later forms, the introduction of the pathogenic protein of the X virus “pure”, with the same goal. The mRNA platforms had and have the exact opposite goal: to convert cells into “convincing simulations” of the virus through the production of the pathogenic protein itself, and moreover after the immune system’s awareness that there has been an invasion of a foreign body (the billions of nanolipids) has been nullified. In this way, the risk is no longer “external” (as in normal vaccines) but becomes “internal”: it is the body itself, its cells! The fact that this led to an inconceivable “collection” of autoimmune diseases (where the immune system considers the body to which it belongs as hostile) was, exactly as expected… Not, unfortunately, by the victims of this campaign.
There is nothing “mysterious” in this logic of organized production of illness. Maintaining the proportions, it is as if the mechanisms of public order plant agents provocateur in a disciplined demonstration, so that opportunities are created for its police repression. Except that in the case of hacking cells with something that appears either as a preventive method or even, in several cases, as “gene therapy”, it is far more overwhelming than a few broken heads or arrests at a demonstration. Beyond the rest, there is a structural difference in scale and method. In the case of genetic engineering, it is about industry, capital, exploitation – not only of (biotechnological) labor but of life itself as such1.
The construction and promotion of this molecular “Trojan horse” (synthetic, viral mRNA) within cells, in order to transform them into (billions of) sources of morbidity, has completely overturned anything conceivable for centuries (regardless of methods), whether as prevention or as treatment. Both in conception and application, it is directly connected to the orientations of capitalism in the 21st century: farewell to the idea of health, long live the idea of “functionality amid disease,” long live the idea of permanent emotional, economic, and biological dependence of citizens on the “health industry”! In order to control and exploit social relations as well as every form of life to the maximum, capital has promoted techniques for capturing and manipulating cells for its own benefit. Furthermore, it must be understood that the on-demand synthesis and production of proteins from living organisms through the hacking of their cells is tailorism/Fordism at the molecular scale!
replicon: the molecular / cellular reproduction of the chapter
The violent, terrorist imposition of genetic engineering onto the species in the form of mRNA platforms from 2021 onwards was not the “end” of this particular techno-scientific capitalist surge. It was the beginning! What the masters of the bioinformatics-security complex identified as a problem during 2021 and 2022 was NOT the challenge of mass morbidity / lethality; that was the undeclared purpose. A key problem was the custodial support for this mass morbidity / lethality! Since this “technology” proved to be an absolute scam regarding its declared goals (which started from fully “vaccinating” the vaccinated and ended with maybe you won’t die from the virus…), the platform boosters had to be repeated regularly, in order to maintain social self-submission regarding their benefits. But this meant maintaining the necessary infrastructure (e.g. vaccination centers…) or, on the other hand, regularly destroying (unused) stockpiles, etc.
The idea of overcoming these …. incapacities (!!!) in the organized, mass production of morbidity existed before the terror campaign: it was the construction of synthetic mRNA that would not only pirate once inside each cellular ribosome, but would be able to “self-replicate” therein, achieving duration in the cellular captivity without external interventions, new syringes, new vials, new transports and logistics, etc. etc.! To put it differently: each infected, alienated cell (many millions such in every organism!) to be unable to rid itself of its poisoning through the expected natural dissolution of the synthetic, alien mRNA, and its replacement by the natural one, but only if it is killed by the (stranded…) immune system (millions of times over), with whatever that means for the creation of autoimmune conditions! Not merely through an initial shock (which someone might be lucky enough to survive) but as a permanent state of cellular, molecular possession!
This idea was named self-amplifying mRNA shot (self-amplifying mRNA injection), sa-mRNA, or affectionately replicon.
See how simply, almost playfully, this leap into the void was presented/advertised by an article on January 25, 2024 in the online edition of the science magazine (name and reality!) – the emphasis in the original:
If you read this website during 2020 and 2021, you will remember the frequent updates on potential coronavirus vaccines and vaccine technologies. It’s easy to forget that up until that point, no adenovirus platform vaccine had ever been approved for use in humans, nor had any mRNA candidate vaccine reached the stage of approval. It was remarkable to see both these technologies (which had been under development for years) simultaneously reach the point of massive human trials, and moreover under regulatory approval, and reach a significant portion of the human population on Earth.
However, while these things were happening, there were also other technologies under examination. For example, Pfizer and BioNTech had at least four candidate mRNA vaccines in development, until they converged on the one that we all know.
And one of these was the “self-amplifying” version, which is an idea that had been discussed for some time in this field. A “typical” mRNA vaccine is loaded with nanoparticles containing the appropriate RNA sequence, shaped so as to be stable, penetrate the cell, and lead to effective protein production once a strand [of synthetic mRNA…] enters. But the amount of mRNA present in the injection is the catch: these things dissolve over time, and you must adjust the dose so as to deliver enough [nanolipids / synthetic mRNA] to trigger the desired immune response.
An injection with self-amplifying mRNA, as the name suggests, contains the equipment needed to multiply once it enters the cells. This is achieved by injecting not only the mRNA for the selected antigen (such as, for example, the one encoding the coronavirus spike protein) but also other mRNA that is converted into the RNA-replicase enzyme, which in turn will lead to the production of more mRNA inside the cell. Imagine sending someone a sheet of paper with some important information, and then imagine sending them a large package of copies of that sheet of paper to share with others. And now imagine sending them a package of sheets with instructions that can convert this paper package into a photocopier machine and thus produce more sheets with instructions. This sounds strange and ridiculous, but what can we do? This is how we can explain the biology to you.
Having an mRNA that can make many copies of itself means (initially) that the injection may not need to contain a large amount of it. John von Neumann, one of the first to think about the possibility of self-replicating machines, would have celebrated enthusiastically. It also means that even with a small initial dose, the expected outcome would be a greater and deeper exposure to the desired antigen protein compared to what could be achieved with a single-shot injection. Thus, while this idea did not appear in the first round of coronavirus vaccines, it was not discarded, and research progressed.
Well, the first vaccine of this kind was approved in Japan, and the involved companies (CSL and Arcturus) intend to seek approval from the European regulatory authority as well. Their vaccine (ARCT-154) uses mRNA which, to ensure its replication, encodes the RNA-replicase enzyme. These secondary mRNAs originate from the Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus…. It appears to be well tolerated, although there was one case of hepatitis in the group that received the self-amplifying injection, so vigilance will be needed when this vaccination is administered to a larger population…
When they talk among themselves (the “experts” and their circles), they call things by their names—or almost… For example, adding to the “package” (i.e., inside the lipid nanoparticles) the replicons of a piece of genetic material from an encephalitis virus (from horses… from Venezuela…) so as to ensure the production of RNA replicase within the host cells and, consequently, the multiplication of the synthetic/viral mRNA and the increase in the quantity of the produced viral protein—this alone would be enough to ban this “technology” forever and imprison for life those who conceived it, work on it, and promote it! Or (in the inverted world of capitalist progress where “health” is called morbidity…) it could be considered a “great scientific achievement”! As in the case of the Pfizer pharmaceutical mafia, which was later revealed (and exclusively among the competent authorities) to have used genetic material from the SV40 monkey virus (simian virus 40) in assembling its synthetic mRNA platform—the one that pushed into millions of bodies…
These things are not said to the millions of ignorant captives. They must remain “blessed” in their ignorances.
Half a year earlier than the above “introduction” to the modern biotech industry, some others were even more precise:
It is about machines, and these are the genetically alienated cells and the corresponding organisms…
(Meanwhile, in the trials, a case of hepatitis also emerged – but where were these experiments conducted, and among how many experimental animals did this one case emerge?)
But what is all this for? The shallow, hasty minds that seek easy and quick answers find them exactly where the bosses have left them for the purpose of confusion: some tangled yarn about reducing the world’s population… No one deserves to pseudo-balance on a tightrope that has a hook at the end, thinking they’ve discovered the conspirators! The very process, the technological orientation, the securing of “intellectual property” (patents), demagogy, the incredible range of experiments and applications, the conferences, the announcements—all point exactly to what this is about: direct and straightforward capitalist control of natural reproduction! What does this mean? Not that Kostas and Eleni will have a girl they’ll name Maria instead of Athanasia—no! It means that: every cell (that interests the bosses), and therefore every organism, will function “naturally” in the way they (the bosses) want. It will “produce” what they want (proteins, enzymes, everything industrially exploitable). It will have the form they want. It will have the value they want.
This, the complete and real subsumption of life as such in every form into capital, may seem crude! But it is thoroughly capitalist. It is a historical product of a journey of at least two centuries, during which various spheres of life were successively occupied and subordinated to capitalist exploitation. From this perspective, nothing is strange.
(The only relatively strange thing is that serious and timely anti-capitalist (and anti-state) critique has been abandoned for at least 3 decades. Thus, “technoscientific progress” reappears as a miracle, whereas earlier it had been revealed as a solid method of control and exploitation).
made in Japan
The use of the first sa-mRNA platform in humans was approved last year in Tokyo.
Why there? Unknown – but the “approval” is not going to remain only there, that is certain!! In their honor, so many Japanese doctors as well as a capable part of Japanese society recognized the seriousness and danger of the issue. The cause is located in the fact that the Japanese (as a society) are historically very cautious towards vaccines (in general) having awareness of the barbaric and murderous medical experiments (and) with vaccines that the Japanese fascists conducted for decades, until the end of the 2nd world war. With this given, the Japanese state did not make the mRNA platformations mandatory/forced for covid-19; however, it (as a government…) guaranteed the same for their “safety” and “effectiveness”. When the murderous and destructive side effects began to skyrocket, a large part of Japanese society neither kept quiet nor became self-reproachful! On the contrary, it became angry and immediately considered the government responsible, taking care to show it. It did the right thing!!
On January 11, 2024, the “committee for the study of vaccines”, headed by the honorary professor of Kyoto University Masanori Fukushima, known in Japan as an oncologist (among other things, head for almost 15 years of the state committee for the reconstruction of the Japanese health system), announced with exhaustively analytical data the enormous extent and incredibly large volume of side effects (from the “classic” mRNA platforms…) in Japan – documenting the demand for their prohibition2.
The Japanese government found itself exposed. Trying to defend itself, it began to murmur, “The WHO told us so.” This did not save it; on the contrary, it also put the pharmaceutical mafia’s sidekick in the crosshairs. Even more so, proper emphasis was given to the sidekick’s efforts to impose a “global pandemic treaty,” granting Western pharmaceutical mafia employees the power to make all decisions regarding what “must be done” in future “pandemics”—under the threat of punishments, sanctions, etc., for disobedient parties (states and citizens).
In mid-April, a very large gathering/demonstration for Japanese standards (where demonstrations are not allowed…) of at least 30,000 people in Tokyo had as its targets:
- the prohibition of any use of mRNA platforms;
- the withdrawal of Tokyo from the P.O.Y.;
- the resignation of the government.
Subsequently, on May 31, an even larger gathering/demonstration took place with the same objectives. However, this time there was a significant political upgrade: Kazuhiro Haraguchi, a member of parliament and former minister of internal affairs and communications, spoke.3 Haraguchi began by asking forgiveness from everyone for so many deaths [from genetic engineering]. He continued by speaking about the prohibition of ivermectin as a therapeutic agent.
Later, he spoke about his personal case: Haraguchi received three doses and developed leukemia. He underwent chemotherapy and survived, but added that three other members of parliament also suffered and were hospitalized due to side effects—but they are not speaking out. And he concluded by addressing censorship and the necessity to continue and strengthen the fight against mRNA platforms.
It is important whether, under such conditions, Japan will proceed with the use of the sa-mRNA platform (which is supposedly intended for the “vulnerable”, elderly, etc.); whether the confirmed side effects will be covered up; and how this type of vaccine will be advertised to the rest of the planet.
Ziggy Stardust
- More in the tetradia for worker use no 8. ↩︎
- Related video with English subtitles at https://www.aussie17.com/p/japan-vaccine-study-groups-press ↩︎
- Related video with English subtitles at https://www.aussie17.com/p/japans-former-minister-for-internal ↩︎